蜡笔小新之布里布里王国的秘密宝藏

为了这部影片，艾玛·斯通推掉了《守望者》导演扎克·施奈德的《美少女特工队》。 平凡的高中女生奥利芙（艾玛·斯通 Emma Stone 饰）生活在一个普通家庭，却也幸福美满。可在学校一直籍籍无名，甚至频繁被当成受气包。一次派对，她为了帮助死党布兰登摆脱同志嫌疑，自编自 导了 一处“破处戏”，从而一举成名成为学校的风云人物，再也没有人来欺负她。而众多平凡的男生慕名而来，希望奥利弗可以帮助他们成为学校的风云人物。从此，乖乖女摇身一变，成了一个处事随便的辣妹，而奥利芙在同学之间名声却彻底臭了。在拜读了霍桑的小说《红字》后，奥利芙觉得故事中女主人公的经历和自己简直太过相似，于是，她招摇地在胸口贴上了一个鲜红的“A”，小女生的高中生活彻底改变……

这是一部意在探讨释放囚犯心理的动作文艺片，一名刚出狱的囚犯，他回到地处密西西比河的故乡探望心爱的女儿;不料遇上了一个对他充满敌意和歧视的巡警对他百般为难，这一极不友好的言行使得他这一趟密西西比之行变得十分困惑和艰难．该片故事情节发展衔接较为顺畅，加上汤米．李．琼斯和马莎．普林顿的卖力表现，其可欣赏性大为增强．

　　陆昊羽（陈锦昀 饰）在一场拍卖会上结识了名为滕娇娇（冯芷墨 饰）的女孩，滕娇娇在阴差阳错之下卖了一瓶红酒给陆昊羽，结果陆昊羽发现这瓶红酒是假的。陆昊羽误以为滕娇娇骗了他，于是要她打工还债。刚开始，滕娇娇一万个不愿意，当陆昊羽的母亲想要涉足此事时，滕娇娇内心的逆反心情被激发了，渐渐的，滕娇娇和陆昊羽走得越来越近，他们都在彼此身上发现了先前未曾看到的闪光点，两个年轻人坠入了情网之中。                                                                    　　当然，这段感情受到了陆家人强烈的反对，然而反对声越是大，陆昊羽和滕娇娇越是义无反顾的选择要在一起。

从监狱里出来后，梅迪打算清算旧账。但首先，他必须与他的帮派恢复联系，而那群人正悠闲地住在一处优美的泰国海滨度假村。

故事讲述了一位哈佛毕业生露西在被另一半贴上“性恐惧症”的标签后，为了证明他是错的，露西列出了一份相当疯狂的待办事项清单，让她踏上了一段自我发现、友谊和新爱的旋风般的旅程。

律师陈志天（郭富城 饰）为了追求心中的良知而成为了一名检控官，他接手的第一个案件是一起性侵案：下肢残疾的钢琴女教师李静（桂纶镁 饰）声称在做身体检查的时候遭到了医生周文瑄（张震 饰）的性侵，而李静同时也是周文瑄女儿婷婷的钢琴老师。陈志天坚信李静受到了侵犯，竭尽全力为她讨回公道。而周文瑄也声称自己无罪，并找来了陈志天的前同事薛肇文（夏雨 饰）担任他的辩护律师。这起性侵案在社会上引起了很大的反响，原被告双方原本的生活都受到了严重干扰。然而原告与被告之间有什么不可告人的秘密，这起性侵案背后又有多少不为人知的隐情？ 徐克监制，香港演员杨采妮执导的首部电影。

　　时间已经过去了七年，外星怪兽已经冲破了禁区封锁，拓展到世界各地。人类不再处于地球食物链的顶端，不得不为生存而挣扎。为了保护美国的利益，很多士兵被派往了国外与外星怪兽作战，但取得这场战争的胜利希望渺茫。 　　诺亚是一名老兵，他新接到一项命令：深入怪兽的核心区去解救一名困在那里的美国大兵，然而这项任务遭遇意外，诺亚的通讯和运输都被切断，队友只剩下一个刚刚从军校毕业、毫无

这是一个情感跨越种族、亲情和友情的故事，整部都在以不同的方式歌颂人性的伟大......

暂无简介

ThelasttimeBritainwasamajorforceinworldcinemawasinthe1960s;adocumentaryofafewyearsbackonthesubjectwasentitled’HollywoodUK’.ThiswastheeraoftheKitchenSink,socialrealism,angryyoungmen;aboveall,thetheatrical.Andyet,ironically,thebestBritishfilmsofthedecadeweremadebytwoAmericans,RichardLesterandJosephLosey,wholargelystayedclearoftheperiod’smoretypicalsubjectmatter,which,likeallattemptsatgreaterrealism,nowseemscuriouslyarchaic.’KingandCountry’,though,seemstobetheLoseyfilmthattriestobelongtoitsera.Like’LookBackinAnger’and’ATasteofHoney’,itisbasedonaplay,andoftenseemscumbersomelytheatrical.Like’Lonelinessofthelongdistancerunner’,itsheroisanexploited,reluctantlytransgressiveworkingclassladplayedbyTomCourtenay.Like(theadmittedlybrilliant)’ChargeoftheLightBrigade’,itisahorrified,near-farcical(thoughhumourless)lookatthehorrorsofwar,mostparticularlyitsgapingclassinjustices.PrivateHampisayoungvolunteersoldieratPachendaele,havingservedthreeyearsatthefront,whoiscourt-martialledfordesertion.Increasinglyterrorisedbytheinhumanpointlessnessoftrenchwarfare,thespeedy,grisly,violentdeathsofhiscomradesandthemedieval,rat-infestedconditionsofhistrench,heclaimstohaveemergeddazedfromonegruesomeattackanddecidedtowalkhome,toEngland.HeisdefendedbythearchetypalBritishofficer,CaptainHargreaves,whoprofessesdisdainfortheman’scowardice,butmustdohisduty.Heattemptstospinadefenceonthegroundsofmadness,buttheupper-crustofficershavehearditallbefore.Thisisaverynice,dulyhorrifying,liberal-handwringing,middle-classplay.ItpanderstoalltheclichesoftheGreatWar-thedisgracefulworking-classmassacre,whiletheofficerssupwhiskey(Haig!)-figuredinsomecharminglyobvioussymbolism:Hargreavesthrowingadyingcigaretteinthemud;Hamphystericallyplayingblindman’sbuff.Thesetsarepicturesquelygrim,medieval,amoderninferno,asthesemenlietrappedinanever-ending,subterraneanlabyrinth,litbyhellishfires,withratsforcompanyandtheconstantsoundofshellsandgunfireremindingthemoftheoutsideworld.Theplay,inaverymiddle-classway,isnotreallyabouttheworkingclassatall-Hampismoreofasymbol,anessence,lyinginthedark,desolatelyplayinghisharmonica,anoteofhumanityinascoreofinhumanity.Hedoesn’tdevelopasacharacter.TheplayisreallyaboutHargreaves,hisrealisationoftheshabbyinadequacyofnotionslikeduty.Hedevelops.Thisrealisationsendshimtodrink(tastierthandying!).Likehisprolesubordinates,hefallsinthemud,justasHampissaidtohavedone;heevensaystohissuperior’Weareallmurderers’.Thisisallveryeffective,ifnotmuchofadevelopmentofRCSherriff’screaky’Journey’sEnd’,filmedbyJamesWhalein1930.Itsearnestnessandverbositymayseemalittlestiltedintheageof’PathsofGlory’and’Dr.Strangelove’;wemayfeelthat’Blackaddergoesforth’isatruerrepresentationoftheGreatWar.ButwhatIhavedescribedisnotthefilmLoseyhasmade.Heistoosophisticatedandcannyanintellectualforthat.ThefilmopenswithalingeringpanoveroneofthosemonumentalWarmemorialsyouseealloverBritain(andpresumablyEurope),asiftosayLoseyisgoingtoquestionthereceivedideasofthisstatue,thehumancost.Butwhathe’sreallyquestioningisthisplay,anditswoefulinadequacytorepresentthemanifoldcomplexitiesoftheWar.ThisisBrechtianfilmmakingatitsmostsubtle.Weareconstantlymadeawareoftheartificeofthefilm,thetheatrical-thestilteddialogueisspokenwithdeliberatestiffness;theatricalritualsareemphasised(theinitialinterrogation;thecourtscene,whereactorsliterallytreadtheboards,enunciatingthepredictablespeeches;themirror-playputonbythehystericalsoldiersandtherats;thereligiousceremony;thehorriblefarceoftheexecution).Prosceniumarchesaremadeprominent,audiencesobserveevents.Thisisaplaythatwouldseektocontain,humanise,explaintheGreatWar.Thisisahopelesstask,asLosey’sprovisionalapparatusexplains,’real’photographsofharrowingdetritusfadingfromthescreenasifeventhesearenotenoughtoconveytheWar,nevermindawell-made,bourgeoisplay.Losey’svisionmaybeapocalyptic-itquestionsthepossibilityofrepresentationatall-thevarioustagsofpoetryquotedmakenoimpactonhardmenmenwhorattledthemoffwhenyoung;theShakespeareandualityof’noble’dramacommentedonby’low’comedy,effectsnotranscendence,nogreaterinsight.Losey’scameraworkandcompositionrepeatedlybreaksourinvolvementwiththedrama,anywishwemighthaveformanlysentimentality;inoneremarkablesceneanofficertakesanAubreyBeardsleybookfromthecameraman!Thisideaofthetheatricalevidentlymirrorstherigidclass’roles’playedbythemaincharacters(Hamp’sfatherandgrandfatherwerecobblerstoo;presumablyHargreaves’werealwaysSandhurstcadets).Loseyalsotakesasideswipeatthekitchensinkproject,byusingitstools-historyhasbornehimout.

暂无简介